Connect with us


What is Behavior-Driven Development

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) is a software development approach that aims to improve communication and collaboration among different stakeholders involved in the software development process, such as developers, quality assurance (QA) professionals, and non-technical stakeholders.

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) is a software development approach that aims to improve communication and collaboration among different stakeholders involved in the software development process, such as developers, quality assurance (QA) professionals, and non-technical stakeholders. BDD places a strong emphasis on defining the behavior of a system from the user’s perspective.

Key elements of Behavior-Driven Development include:t

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) follows a set of principles and practices that guide the development process. While not rigid rules, the following principles are commonly associated with BDD:

User Stories: BDD often starts with user stories, which are short, narrative descriptions of a feature from an end user’s perspective. These stories serve as the basis for defining the desired behavior of the system.

Ubiquitous Language: BDD promotes the use of a shared, ubiquitous language that is understood by all team members, including developers, QA professionals, and business stakeholders. This helps in reducing ambiguity and fostering better communication.

Three-Amigos Meetings: BDD encourages collaboration through Three-Amigos meetings, where representatives from different roles (typically developers, QA, and business analysts) come together to discuss and refine user stories, ensuring a shared understanding of the requirements.

Given-When-Then: BDD scenarios are often written in the Given-When-Then format. Each scenario includes a context (Given), an event or action (When), and an expected outcome (Then). This format helps in creating clear and executable specifications.

Executable Specifications: BDD scenarios are treated as executable specifications. These specifications are written in a way that can be automated to serve as both documentation and automated tests. Tools like Cucumber, SpecFlow, and Behave are commonly used to implement and execute these specifications.

Automation: BDD places a strong emphasis on test automation. Automated tests are created based on the executable specifications to ensure that the implemented code aligns with the specified behavior. This automation provides quick feedback to the development team.

Continuous Collaboration: Collaboration is not a one-time activity in BDD; it is continuous throughout the development process. Regular communication and collaboration among team members help in refining requirements, addressing issues, and ensuring that the delivered software meets the stakeholders’ expectations.

Focus on Behavior: BDD shifts the focus from implementation details to the observable behavior of the system. It encourages teams to discuss and define the expected behavior before delving into the technical details of implementation.

Incremental Development: BDD aligns well with incremental and iterative development approaches, such as Agile. It allows teams to deliver features in small increments, continuously refining and adding to the behavior specifications as the software evolves.

Feedback Loop: BDD establishes a feedback loop by continuously running automated tests based on the specified behavior. This helps in identifying and addressing issues early in the development process, reducing the cost of fixing defects.

While these principles guide the practice of BDD, teams may adapt and customize their approach based on their specific needs and the nature of the project. The key is to maintain a collaborative and user-centric mindset throughout the development lifecycle.

Behavior-Driven Development

Example of Behavior-Driven Development

Let’s walk through a simple example of Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) using the Given-When-Then format. In this example, we’ll consider a basic feature for a calculator application.

User Story: As a user, I want to be able to add two numbers using a calculator, so that I can quickly get the sum of those numbers.

Scenario: Adding Two Numbers

Given the calculator is turned on
When I enter the number 5
And I enter the number 7
And I press the add button
Then the result should be 12 on the display

In this scenario:

  • Given: Describes the initial context or setup. In this case, the calculator is turned on.
  • When: Describes the action or event that occurs. Here, the user enters the numbers 5 and 7 and presses the add button.
  • Then: Describes the expected outcome or result. The result displayed on the calculator should be 12.

Executable Specification (Cucumber Feature File):

Feature: Calculator Addition

  Scenario: Adding Two Numbers
    Given the calculator is turned on
    When I enter the number 5
    And I enter the number 7
    And I press the add button
    Then the result should be 12 on the display

This feature file can be written in a natural language format and serves as both documentation and a basis for automated testing. The team can use a BDD tool like Cucumber to translate these specifications into executable tests in a programming language such as Java, Ruby, or Python.

Example of Step Definitions (Cucumber with Java):

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

public class CalculatorSteps {
    private Calculator calculator;
    private int result;

    @Given("the calculator is turned on")
    public void theCalculatorIsTurnedOn() {
        calculator = new Calculator();

    @When("I enter the number {int}")
    public void iEnterTheNumber(int number) {

    @When("I press the add button")
    public void iPressTheAddButton() {
        result = calculator.add();

    @Then("the result should be {int} on the display")
    public void theResultShouldBeOnTheDisplay(int expected) {
        assertEquals(expected, result);

In this Java example, the Cucumber feature file’s steps are implemented using step definitions. The Calculator class would represent the actual calculator implementation.

This is a simple example, but in a real-world scenario, BDD would involve more comprehensive scenarios, potentially involving different user roles, additional features, and a more extensive set of tests to cover various scenarios and edge cases.

Disadvantages of Behaviour-Driven Development

While Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) has many advantages, it’s important to acknowledge that no development approach is without its challenges. Some potential disadvantages of BDD include:

  1. Time and Effort: Writing and maintaining BDD scenarios can be time-consuming. The process of creating detailed specifications in natural language, along with associated automation, may require more effort than traditional testing methods.
  2. Learning Curve: BDD introduces a new set of practices and tools, which may have a learning curve for team members who are not familiar with the approach. Training and adaptation can be necessary to effectively implement BDD.
  3. Overemphasis on Testing: BDD often focuses heavily on test automation, which may lead to an overemphasis on testing at the expense of other important development activities. Teams may need to strike a balance between testing and other aspects of software development.
  4. Misuse of Automation: Over-reliance on automated testing without considering its limitations can be a disadvantage. Automation is a tool to aid testing, but it cannot replace critical thinking and exploratory testing by humans.
  5. Maintainability of Scenarios: As the software evolves, BDD scenarios may need to be updated and maintained. Keeping scenarios aligned with changes in requirements and code can be challenging, especially in large and complex projects.
  6. Dependency on Collaboration: BDD relies heavily on collaboration between team members. If communication breaks down or team members are not actively engaged in the process, the benefits of BDD may diminish.
  7. Overhead in Small Projects: For small and straightforward projects, the overhead of creating and maintaining BDD scenarios may outweigh the benefits. BDD is often considered more beneficial in complex projects with changing requirements.
  8. Tool Dependency: BDD often involves the use of specific tools like Cucumber, SpecFlow, or Behave. Depending too heavily on these tools may create dependencies that could be a disadvantage if the tools become outdated or if the team wants to transition to different tools.
  9. Ambiguity in Natural Language: Natural language, used to express behavior in BDD scenarios, can sometimes be ambiguous. This ambiguity may lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of requirements.
  10. Resistance to Change: Introducing BDD may face resistance from team members who are accustomed to traditional development methods. Shifting to a collaborative, behavior-focused approach requires a cultural shift and may encounter resistance.

It’s essential to note that the effectiveness of BDD depends on factors such as team collaboration, project complexity, and the commitment to following BDD principles. Addressing these potential disadvantages involves careful consideration, training, and adapting practices to suit the specific needs of the development team and project.